文章目录[隐藏]
柔性供应链软件开发:云原生技术融合实践教程
引言:供应链数字化转型的必然选择
在当今全球商业环境中,供应链正面临着前所未有的挑战与机遇。市场需求波动加剧、全球化布局复杂化、消费者期望不断提升,这些因素共同推动着传统供应链向数字化、智能化方向转型。柔性供应链作为应对不确定性的关键策略,其核心在于通过技术手段构建能够快速响应变化的动态系统。而云原生技术,以其弹性、可扩展和敏捷的特性,成为实现柔性供应链的理想技术架构。本教程将深入探讨如何将云原生技术融合到柔性供应链软件开发中,提供从理论到实践的完整指南。
第一章:柔性供应链的核心特征与技术需求
1.1 柔性供应链的五大维度
柔性供应链并非单一概念,而是包含多个维度的综合能力体系:
- 数量柔性:能够快速调整生产与配送规模,应对需求波动
- 交付柔性:适应不同交付时间要求和紧急订单处理
- 产品柔性:支持产品配置变更和新产品快速引入
- 路由柔性:在供应链中断时快速调整物流路径
- 混合柔性:在同一生产线上处理不同产品的能力
1.2 技术实现的关键需求
要实现上述柔性特征,供应链软件需要具备以下技术能力:
- 实时数据处理:对供应链各环节数据实时采集与分析
- 模块化架构:各功能模块可独立开发、部署和扩展
- 弹性计算能力:根据负载自动调整资源分配
- 多系统集成:与ERP、WMS、TMS等现有系统无缝对接
- 智能决策支持:基于AI/ML的预测与优化能力
第二章:云原生技术栈与供应链融合架构
2.1 云原生核心组件解析
云原生技术为柔性供应链提供了理想的技术基础:
- 容器化技术:Docker实现应用环境标准化,确保开发与生产环境一致性
- 编排系统:Kubernetes管理容器化应用的部署、扩展和运维
- 微服务架构:将供应链功能拆分为独立服务,提高系统灵活性
- 服务网格:Istio等服务网格技术处理服务间通信,增强可观察性
- 无服务器计算:应对突发流量,优化资源利用率
2.2 供应链云原生参考架构
基于云原生的柔性供应链系统可采用分层架构设计:
表现层:响应式Web界面、移动应用、API网关
业务层:订单管理微服务、库存管理微服务、物流跟踪微服务、供应商协作微服务
数据层:实时数据流处理、分布式数据库、数据湖、缓存系统
基础设施层:容器平台、服务网格、CI/CD流水线、监控告警系统
第三章:实践开发教程:构建柔性库存管理模块
3.1 环境准备与项目初始化
首先,我们需要设置开发环境:
# 安装必要工具
brew install kubectl docker helm minikube
# 启动本地Kubernetes集群
minikube start --driver=docker
# 创建项目结构
mkdir flexible-supply-chain
cd flexible-supply-chain
mkdir -p inventory-service/{src,deploy,test}
3.2 微服务设计与实现
以库存管理微服务为例,展示如何实现柔性功能:
// InventoryService.java - 库存管理核心服务
@RestController
@RequestMapping("/api/inventory")
public class InventoryService {
@Autowired
private InventoryRepository repository;
@Autowired
private KafkaTemplate<String, String> kafkaTemplate;
// 柔性库存分配算法
@PostMapping("/allocate")
public ResponseEntity<AllocationResult> allocateInventory(
@RequestBody AllocationRequest request) {
// 实时库存检查
InventoryStatus status = repository.getRealTimeStatus(
request.getProductId(), request.getWarehouseId());
// 动态分配逻辑:考虑优先级、地理位置、库存周转率
AllocationStrategy strategy = selectStrategy(
request.getPriority(), status);
AllocationResult result = strategy.execute(request, status);
// 发布库存变更事件
kafkaTemplate.send("inventory-events",
createInventoryEvent(result));
return ResponseEntity.ok(result);
}
// 基于规则的策略选择器
private AllocationStrategy selectStrategy(Priority priority,
InventoryStatus status) {
if (priority == Priority.URGENT) {
return new CrossWarehouseAllocation();
} else if (status.getTurnoverRate() > 0.8) {
return new HighTurnoverStrategy();
} else {
return new StandardAllocation();
}
}
}
3.3 容器化部署与配置
创建Dockerfile和Kubernetes部署文件:
# Dockerfile
FROM openjdk:11-jre-slim
COPY target/inventory-service.jar /app.jar
EXPOSE 8080
ENTRYPOINT ["java", "-jar", "/app.jar"]
# inventory-deployment.yaml
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: inventory-service
spec:
replicas: 3
selector:
matchLabels:
app: inventory
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: inventory
spec:
containers:
- name: inventory
image: inventory-service:1.0
ports:
- containerPort: 8080
resources:
requests:
memory: "256Mi"
cpu: "250m"
limits:
memory: "512Mi"
cpu: "500m"
env:
- name: DB_HOST
valueFrom:
configMapKeyRef:
name: app-config
key: database.host
---
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
name: inventory-service
spec:
selector:
app: inventory
ports:
- port: 80
targetPort: 8080
type: LoadBalancer
第四章:弹性扩展与自动化运维实践
4.1 基于Kubernetes的自动扩缩容
通过Horizontal Pod Autoscaler实现根据负载自动调整服务实例数量:
# hpa-inventory.yaml
apiVersion: autoscaling/v2beta2
kind: HorizontalPodAutoscaler
metadata:
name: inventory-hpa
spec:
scaleTargetRef:
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
name: inventory-service
minReplicas: 2
maxReplicas: 10
metrics:
- type: Resource
resource:
name: cpu
target:
type: Utilization
averageUtilization: 70
- type: Resource
resource:
name: memory
target:
type: Utilization
averageUtilization: 80
4.2 服务网格实现智能路由
使用Istio实现流量管理、故障恢复和A/B测试:
# inventory-virtualservice.yaml
apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1
kind: VirtualService
metadata:
name: inventory-route
spec:
hosts:
- inventory-service
http:
- match:
- headers:
x-user-type:
exact: premium
route:
- destination:
host: inventory-service
subset: v2
weight: 100
- route:
- destination:
host: inventory-service
subset: v1
weight: 90
- destination:
host: inventory-service
subset: v2
weight: 10
4.3 持续部署流水线配置
使用GitLab CI/CD实现自动化部署:
# .gitlab-ci.yml
stages:
- build
- test
- deploy
variables:
IMAGE_TAG: $CI_REGISTRY_IMAGE:$CI_COMMIT_SHORT_SHA
build-job:
stage: build
script:
- mvn clean package
- docker build -t $IMAGE_TAG .
- docker push $IMAGE_TAG
deploy-dev:
stage: deploy
environment:
name: development
script:
- kubectl config use-context dev-cluster
- kubectl set image deployment/inventory-service inventory=$IMAGE_TAG
- kubectl rollout status deployment/inventory-service
only:
- develop
deploy-prod:
stage: deploy
environment:
name: production
script:
- kubectl config use-context prod-cluster
- kubectl apply -f k8s/production/
- kubectl rollout status deployment/inventory-service
only:
- master
when: manual
第五章:监控、优化与安全实践
5.1 全链路可观察性建设
构建完整的监控体系:
# monitoring-stack.yaml
# 使用Prometheus + Grafana + Jaeger构建监控体系
apiVersion: monitoring.coreos.com/v1
kind: Prometheus
metadata:
name: supply-chain-monitor
spec:
serviceMonitorSelector:
matchLabels:
app: inventory
resources:
requests:
memory: 400Mi
---
apiVersion: opentelemetry.io/v1alpha1
kind: OpenTelemetryCollector
metadata:
name: trace-collector
spec:
mode: deployment
config: |
receivers:
jaeger:
protocols:
grpc:
exporters:
jaeger:
endpoint: jaeger-all-in-one:14250
insecure: true
service:
pipelines:
traces:
receivers: [jaeger]
exporters: [jaeger]
5.2 性能优化策略
针对供应链场景的特殊优化:
- 数据库优化:使用读写分离、缓存策略(Redis)、分库分表
- API响应优化:实施GraphQL替代RESTful API,减少过度获取
- 事件驱动架构:使用Kafka解耦服务,提高系统响应能力
- 边缘计算:在仓库节点部署轻量级计算,减少数据传输延迟
5.3 安全最佳实践
确保供应链数据安全:
- 零信任架构:每个请求都需要验证,无论来源
- 秘密管理:使用HashiCorp Vault或Kubernetes Secrets管理敏感信息
- 网络策略:通过NetworkPolicy限制Pod间通信
- API安全:实施OAuth 2.0、JWT令牌和API速率限制
第六章:案例研究:全球零售企业的柔性供应链改造
6.1 挑战与目标
某全球零售企业面临以下挑战:
- 季节性需求波动剧烈,峰值达平时的5倍
- 全球供应商超过2000家,协调困难
- 库存周转率低,仓储成本高企
- 系统响应慢,订单处理需数小时
6.2 实施路径与成果
通过18个月的云原生改造:
- 第一阶段(6个月):核心库存管理系统微服务化,部署到Kubernetes平台
- 第二阶段(6个月):引入事件驱动架构,实现实时库存同步
- 第三阶段(6个月):添加AI预测模块,优化库存分配
成果指标:
- 系统弹性提升:自动扩展应对300%流量增长
- 订单处理时间:从4小时缩短至15分钟
- 库存周转率:提高35%
- 运营成本:降低28%
结语:面向未来的柔性供应链技术趋势
云原生技术与柔性供应链的融合不仅是当前数字化转型的解决方案,更是面向未来智能供应链的基础。随着5G、物联网、边缘计算和人工智能技术的进一步发展,供应链系统将变得更加智能、自适应和抗脆弱。开发者和架构师需要持续关注以下趋势:
- AI驱动的自主供应链:系统能够自我学习、预测和决策
- 区块链增强的可追溯性:提供不可篡改的全程追溯能力
- 数字孪生技术:创建物理供应链的虚拟映射,进行模拟与优化
- 可持续供应链:通过技术手段减少碳足迹,实现绿色运营
柔性供应链的云原生实践之旅是一个持续演进的过程。通过本教程介绍的方法论和实践指南,企业可以逐步构建起适应不确定时代的弹性供应链系统,在日益复杂的商业环境中保持竞争优势。记住,技术实施的成功不仅取决于工具选择,更取决于组织文化、流程适配和持续改进的承诺。
第七章:云原生供应链的数据治理与智能分析
7.1 数据湖与实时分析架构
数据分层治理策略
柔性供应链需要处理多源异构数据,建立有效的数据治理体系至关重要:
# data-governance-pipeline.yaml
apiVersion: data.fluid.io/v1alpha1
kind: Dataset
metadata:
name: supply-chain-data
spec:
mounts:
- mountPoint: s3://supply-chain-raw/
name: raw
path: "/raw"
- mountPoint: s3://supply-chain-processed/
name: processed
path: "/processed"
- mountPoint: s3://supply-chain-curated/
name: curated
path: "/curated"
dataGovernance:
retentionPolicy:
raw: 30d
processed: 180d
curated: 365d
accessControl:
- role: data-engineer
permissions: [read, write]
- role: business-analyst
permissions: [read]
实时流处理管道
使用Apache Flink处理供应链实时数据流:
// RealTimeInventoryStream.java
public class RealTimeInventoryStream {
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
StreamExecutionEnvironment env =
StreamExecutionEnvironment.getExecutionEnvironment();
// 从Kafka读取实时库存事件
DataStream<InventoryEvent> inventoryStream = env
.addSource(new FlinkKafkaConsumer<>(
"inventory-events",
new InventoryEventSchema(),
properties))
.name("inventory-source");
// 实时库存预警处理
DataStream<InventoryAlert> alertStream = inventoryStream
.keyBy(InventoryEvent::getWarehouseId)
.process(new InventoryAlertProcessFunction())
.name("alert-processor");
// 动态安全库存计算
DataStream<SafetyStockUpdate> safetyStockStream = inventoryStream
.keyBy(InventoryEvent::getProductId)
.window(SlidingEventTimeWindows.of(Time.days(7), Time.hours(1)))
.process(new SafetyStockCalculator())
.name("safety-stock-calculator");
// 输出到多个目的地
alertStream.addSink(new KafkaSink<>("inventory-alerts"));
safetyStockStream.addSink(new ElasticsearchSink<>());
env.execute("Real-time Inventory Analytics");
}
}
7.2 供应链知识图谱构建
图数据库建模
使用Neo4j构建供应链实体关系网络:
// 创建供应链知识图谱
CREATE CONSTRAINT ON (s:Supplier) ASSERT s.id IS UNIQUE;
CREATE CONSTRAINT ON (p:Product) ASSERT p.sku IS UNIQUE;
CREATE CONSTRAINT ON (w:Warehouse) ASSERT w.code IS UNIQUE;
// 构建供应商-产品-仓库关系网络
MATCH (s:Supplier {id: $supplierId})
MERGE (p:Product {sku: $sku, name: $productName})
MERGE (w:Warehouse {code: $warehouseCode, location: $location})
CREATE (s)-[:SUPPLIES {leadTime: $leadTime, cost: $unitCost}]->(p)
CREATE (p)-[:STORED_AT {quantity: $quantity, safetyStock: $safetyStock}]->(w)
CREATE (w)-[:SHIPS_TO {transitTime: $transitTime}]->(:Region {name: $regionName});
// 查询多级供应链网络
MATCH path = (s:Supplier)-[:SUPPLIES*1..3]->(p:Product)
-[:STORED_AT]->(w:Warehouse)
WHERE p.category = 'Electronics'
RETURN s.name AS Supplier,
collect(DISTINCT p.name) AS Products,
w.location AS WarehouseLocation,
length(path) AS SupplyChainDepth
ORDER BY SupplyChainDepth;
图神经网络预测
使用GNN进行供应链风险预测:
# supply_chain_gnn.py
import torch
import torch.nn.functional as F
from torch_geometric.nn import GCNConv
class SupplyChainGNN(torch.nn.Module):
def __init__(self, num_features, hidden_channels, num_classes):
super().__init__()
self.conv1 = GCNConv(num_features, hidden_channels)
self.conv2 = GCNConv(hidden_channels, hidden_channels)
self.conv3 = GCNConv(hidden_channels, hidden_channels)
self.lin = torch.nn.Linear(hidden_channels, num_classes)
def forward(self, x, edge_index, edge_attr):
# 节点特征:供应商可靠性、地理位置、产能等
# 边特征:运输时间、成本、历史履约率等
x = self.conv1(x, edge_index, edge_attr)
x = F.relu(x)
x = F.dropout(x, p=0.5, training=self.training)
x = self.conv2(x, edge_index, edge_attr)
x = F.relu(x)
x = self.conv3(x, edge_index, edge_attr)
x = self.lin(x)
return F.log_softmax(x, dim=1)
def predict_risk(self, supply_chain_graph):
"""预测供应链节点风险"""
self.eval()
with torch.no_grad():
logits = self.forward(
supply_chain_graph.x,
supply_chain_graph.edge_index,
supply_chain_graph.edge_attr
)
risk_scores = torch.argmax(logits, dim=1)
return risk_scores.numpy()
第八章:多云与混合云部署策略
8.1 跨云供应链架构设计
多云服务网格配置
使用Anthos或Istio多集群实现跨云部署:
# multi-cloud-mesh.yaml
apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1
kind: ServiceEntry
metadata:
name: cross-cloud-services
spec:
hosts:
- inventory-service.aws.amazonaws.com
- logistics-service.gcp.googleapis.com
- supplier-portal.azure.microsoft.com
ports:
- number: 443
name: https
protocol: HTTPS
resolution: DNS
location: MESH_EXTERNAL
---
apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1
kind: DestinationRule
metadata:
name: cross-cloud-load-balancing
spec:
host: "*.amazonaws.com"
trafficPolicy:
loadBalancer:
simple: ROUND_ROBIN
connectionPool:
tcp:
maxConnections: 100
connectTimeout: 30ms
http:
http2MaxRequests: 1000
maxRequestsPerConnection: 10
outlierDetection:
consecutive5xxErrors: 10
interval: 5s
baseEjectionTime: 30s
maxEjectionPercent: 50
数据同步与一致性保障
实现跨云数据同步:
// CrossCloudDataSync.java
@Component
public class CrossCloudDataSync {
@Autowired
private CloudSyncCoordinator coordinator;
@Value("${cloud.providers}")
private List<String> cloudProviders;
@Scheduled(fixedDelay = 30000)
public void syncInventoryData() {
Map<String, InventorySnapshot> snapshots =
cloudProviders.parallelStream()
.collect(Collectors.toMap(
provider -> provider,
this::fetchInventorySnapshot
));
// 使用CRDT进行冲突解决
MergedInventory merged = coordinator.mergeSnapshots(snapshots);
// 异步推送到所有云
cloudProviders.forEach(provider ->
asyncUpdateInventory(provider, merged)
);
}
private InventorySnapshot fetchInventorySnapshot(String provider) {
// 从不同云提供商获取数据
switch (provider) {
case "aws":
return fetchFromDynamoDB();
case "azure":
return fetchFromCosmosDB();
case "gcp":
return fetchFromFirestore();
default:
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Unknown provider");
}
}
}
8.2 边缘计算集成
边缘节点部署模式
在仓库、零售店等边缘位置部署轻量级服务:
# edge-inventory-service.yaml
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: edge-inventory-service
labels:
app: edge-inventory
spec:
replicas: 50 # 部署到50个边缘位置
selector:
matchLabels:
app: edge-inventory
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: edge-inventory
spec:
nodeSelector:
node-type: edge
containers:
- name: inventory
image: edge-inventory:1.0
resources:
requests:
memory: "128Mi"
cpu: "100m"
env:
- name: EDGE_LOCATION_ID
valueFrom:
fieldRef:
fieldPath: spec.nodeName
- name: OFFLINE_MODE
value: "true"
volumeMounts:
- name: local-storage
mountPath: /data
volumes:
- name: local-storage
hostPath:
path: /var/edge-data
type: DirectoryOrCreate
边缘-云协同处理
实现边缘计算与云中心的智能协同:
# edge_cloud_orchestrator.py
import asyncio
from typing import Dict, Optional
from dataclasses import dataclass
from enum import Enum
class SyncStrategy(Enum):
REAL_TIME = "real_time"
BATCH = "batch"
LAZY = "lazy"
@dataclass
class EdgeNode:
node_id: str
location: str
connectivity_score: float
last_sync: float
local_data: Dict
class EdgeCloudOrchestrator:
def __init__(self, cloud_endpoint: str):
self.cloud_endpoint = cloud_endpoint
self.edge_nodes: Dict[str, EdgeNode] = {}
self.sync_queue = asyncio.Queue()
async def register_edge_node(self, node: EdgeNode):
"""注册边缘节点"""
self.edge_nodes[node.node_id] = node
# 根据连接质量选择同步策略
if node.connectivity_score > 0.8:
strategy = SyncStrategy.REAL_TIME
elif node.connectivity_score > 0.3:
strategy = SyncStrategy.BATCH
else:
strategy = SyncStrategy.LAZY
await self.configure_sync_strategy(node.node_id, strategy)
async def adaptive_sync(self, node_id: str, data: Dict):
"""自适应数据同步"""
node = self.edge_nodes[node_id]
# 判断数据优先级
priority = self.calculate_priority(data)
if priority == "high" and node.connectivity_score > 0.5:
# 实时同步关键数据
await self.real_time_sync(node_id, data)
elif priority == "medium":
# 批量同步
await self.batch_sync(node_id, data)
else:
# 延迟同步
await self.queue_for_later_sync(node_id, data)
async def real_time_sync(self, node_id: str, data: Dict):
"""实时同步到云端"""
try:
async with aiohttp.ClientSession() as session:
async with session.post(
f"{self.cloud_endpoint}/sync/realtime",
json={
"node_id": node_id,
"data": data,
"timestamp": time.time()
}
) as response:
if response.status == 200:
node = self.edge_nodes[node_id]
node.last_sync = time.time()
except Exception as e:
# 同步失败,降级到本地存储
await self.store_locally(node_id, data)
第九章:供应链韧性测试与混沌工程
9.1 韧性测试框架设计
故障注入测试套件
构建全面的供应链系统韧性测试:
# chaos-testing-suite.yaml
apiVersion: chaos-mesh.org/v1alpha1
kind: ChaosExperiment
metadata:
name: supply-chain-resilience-test
spec:
duration: "1h"
tests:
- name: network-latency-test
type: NetworkChaos
spec:
action: delay
mode: all
selector:
namespaces: ["supply-chain"]
labelSelectors:
app: ["inventory", "logistics"]
delay:
latency: "500ms"
correlation: "50"
jitter: "100ms"
- name: database-failure-test
type: PodChaos
spec:
action: pod-failure
mode: one
selector:
namespaces: ["supply-chain"]
labelSelectors:
app: "inventory-db"
duration: "5m"
- name: cloud-service-outage
type: AWSChaos
spec:
action: ec2-stop
region: us-east-1
instanceIds: ["i-1234567890abcdef0"]
duration: "10m"
- name: dependency-degradation
type: StressChaos
spec:
mode: one
selector:
namespaces: ["supply-chain"]
labelSelectors:
app: "payment-service"
stressors:
cpu:
workers: 4
load: 90
duration: "3m"
metrics:
successCriteria:
- name: order-processing-success-rate
threshold: 95%
- name: system-recovery-time
threshold: 5m
- name: data-consistency-rate
threshold: 99.9%
自动化韧性测试流水线
集成到CI/CD流程中的自动化测试:
// Jenkinsfile
pipeline {
agent any
stages {
stage('Build') {
steps {
sh 'mvn clean package'
sh 'docker build -t supply-chain-app .'
}
}
stage('Resilience Tests') {
parallel {
stage('Chaos Testing') {
steps {
sh '''
kubectl apply -f chaos-experiments/
# 运行混沌实验
chaos run chaos-experiment.yaml
# 验证系统行为
python verify_resilience.py
--metrics-order-success-rate=95
--metrics-recovery-time=300
'''
}
}
stage('Load Testing') {
steps {
sh '''
# 模拟峰值负载
k6 run --vus 1000 --duration 10m
load-test.js
# 验证弹性扩展
kubectl get hpa -w
'''
}
}
}
}
stage('Recovery Validation') {
steps {
sh '''
# 验证故障恢复后数据一致性
python verify_data_consistency.py
--tolerance=0.001
# 验证服务级别目标
python verify_slos.py
--availability=99.95
--latency-p99=200ms
'''
}
}
}
post {
always {
// 清理混沌实验
sh 'kubectl delete -f chaos-experiments/'
// 生成韧性报告
sh 'python generate_resilience_report.py'
// 归档测试结果
archiveArtifacts artifacts: 'reports/*.html'
}
}
}
9.2 自适应韧性策略
基于AI的故障预测与自愈
实现智能的故障预测和自动恢复:
# adaptive_resilience_engine.py
import numpy as np
from sklearn.ensemble import IsolationForest
from datetime import datetime, timedelta
import pandas as pd
class AdaptiveResilienceEngine:
def __init__(self):
self.anomaly_detector = IsolationForest(
contamination=0.1,
random_state=42
)
self.failure_patterns = self.load_failure_patterns()
self.recovery_strategies = self.load_recovery_strategies()
def predict_failure(self, metrics: pd.DataFrame) -> dict:
"""预测潜在故障"""
# 特征工程
features = self.extract_features(metrics)
# 异常检测
anomalies = self.anomaly_detector.predict(features)
# 模式匹配
predictions = []
for idx, is_anomaly in enumerate(anomalies):
if is_anomaly == -1:
pattern = self.match_failure_pattern(
features.iloc[idx]
)
if pattern:
predictions.append({
'component': pattern['component'],
'failure_type': pattern['type'],
'confidence': pattern['confidence'],
'eta': pattern.get('eta', '1h'),
'suggested_action': pattern['action']
})
return {
'predictions': predictions,
'timestamp': datetime.now(),
'metrics_analyzed': len(metrics)
}
def execute_recovery(self, failure_prediction: dict):
"""执行自动恢复"""
strategy = self.select_recovery_strategy(
failure_prediction
)
if strategy['type'] == 'auto_scale':
self.auto_scale_component(
failure_prediction['component'],
strategy['scale_factor']
)
elif strategy['type'] == 'traffic_reroute':
self.reroute_traffic(
failure_prediction['component'],
strategy['alternative_components']
)
elif strategy['type'] == 'degraded_mode':
self.enable_degraded_mode(
failure_prediction['component'],
strategy['degraded_features']
)
# 记录恢复操作
self.log_recovery_action(failure_prediction, strategy)
def auto_scale_component(self, component: str, scale_factor: float):
"""自动扩缩容"""
# 获取当前副本数
current_replicas = self.get_replica_count(component)
# 计算目标副本数
target_replicas = max(
2, # 最小副本数
int(current_replicas * scale_factor)
)
